How
important is it to include technology in today's classroom?
This
question was recently examined by the New York Times which recently printed acritique of ipad education by Carlo Rotella, director of American studies at
Boston College. Rotella, who himself doesn't even allow laptops into his
university classrooms, set out to examine the effects, both positive and
negative, of using tablets for students' class work, homework and educational
games.
Rotella
travelled to Guilford County, North Carolina, where the school district has
embarked on an ambitious program that will provide all of this year's middle
school students with a tablet device. He
spoke to district teachers and elearning facilitators and then moved on to speak
to other individuals who are involved in online education in America' s
schools. These included conversations with Joel Klein, former Chancellor of the
New York Public School System and presently the head of the company that makes
Amplify tablets, representatives of the United States Department of Education, educational
research psychologists, experts on education and technology and even a
neuroscientist specializing in the study of adolescent brain development.
Rotella
admits that he is a skeptic of elearning, especially as it relates to
elementary and young teen learners. But he noted the benefits of tablet
learning which include:
·
Elearning makes
personalization possible in the classroom. It provides the possibility for
immediate feedback to both student and the teacher who can then make timely
decisions about how to proceed with the lesson, when to work with individuals
and when to work with groups, etc.
·
Entire units of curriculum
can be loaded on the tablet in advance of a lesson or can be sent out as an
instant update. This accommodates students as they work at their individual
paces.
·
There is a wide variety of educational
tools available for research, discussion, practice and demonstration of mastery
to allow students to approach their studies from various angles. The teacher
can then move into the role of a mentor who provides each student with
individual assistance as needed
·
School districts spend less money on textbooks
·
eGames support personalized
learning. Personalized learning matches game logic respond to what a player
does. A game is arranged in series of increasingly difficult challenges to fit
the sequencing of curriculum. (i.e. When you conquer the fractions level, you
move up to the algebra level.)
One
of Rotella's concerns related to the "discussion" aspect of tablet
learning as opposed to real-time face-to-face conversations that would occur in
a non-elearning class. As many teachers have discovered however, blended learning
addresses this concern by incorporating elements of online learning with
traditional frontal teaching, group activities and classroom interactions.
Rotella
examined tablet learning in a general format but for the Jewish classroom,elearning has many similar applications. Students can engage in core curriculum
subjects such as gemorrah, chumash and Jewish history or may expand to explore
subjects such as tikkun olam, Contemporary Jewish Issues, the Holocaust, the Arab-Israeli
Conflict, varying Jewish communities and even questions about Basic Judaism
through interactive online lessons.
No comments:
Post a Comment